Co Kildare: Archaeological Objects at The British Museum

The British Museum holds eight items identified as coming from Co Kildare. The majority of these (3) are assigned to the Bronze Age, followed by the Late Medieval period (2). The most common object type represented are floors (2). Only three material types are represented in this assemblage: Metal (5), Pottery (2), and Stone (1).




Neolithic/Bronze Age: Stone item
Kildare
axe
18730602.166
Polished stone axe with flat butt; slight damage at butt end of face.
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1556848&partId=1


Bronze Age: Metal items
Kildare
socketed axe
18730602.160
Copper alloy socketed axe; cast. Body cross-section octagonal. Unusual axe as it has a band of five ridges around the lower part of the neck.
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=807564&partId=1

Kildare
sword
18761214.130
Copper alloy sword. The tang has been cast on. It has one rivet-hole and there are three rivet-holes in the rounded butt; the repair may have filled up another.
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=807809&partId=1

Latallion
pin
19211206.320
Copper alloy disc headed pin with pimple in centre of head.
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=830866&partId=1


Middle Bronze Age: Metal item
Kildare
palstave
18730602.900
Copper alloy palstave, damaged.
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=807204&partId=1


Early Medieval: Metal item
Ballitore (near)
penannular brooch
18710401.170
Leaded bronze penannular brooch with grooved hoop; expanded zoomorphic terminals with triangular enamel and millefiori settings.
5thC-7thC
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=87020&partId=1


Late Medieval: Pottery items
Newbridge Abbey, abbey
floor-tile
19470505.2209
Earthenware floor tile, lead-glazed.
14thC-15thC
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=25758&partId=1

Newbridge Abbey, abbey
floor-tile
19470505.2208
Earthenware floor tile, lead-glazed.
14thC-15thC
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=25792&partId=1

< Table of Contents
Location: Great Russell St, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DG, UK

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Always remember to draw the swastika turning to the right": Some thoughts on swastika directionality in Early Medieval Irish Art

Image
Swastikas are, for a number of reasons, endlessly fascinating symbols. Like all symbols, they are only invested with the meanings we give them. Otherwise they are just little shapes and drawings that mean nothing in and of themselves. Owing to its long history and brief (if traumatic) association with Nazism, the swastika probably has a stronger resonance than most. You won’t spend long on the internet attempting to discuss the swastika before someone, trying to be helpful, notes that the Nazi version rotated counter-clockwise (elbows pointing left) and was bad, but the good Buddhist/Hindu version rotated clockwise. They may be trying to be helpful, but they are invariably wrong. It’s true that the version Adolf Hitler designed for the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei only went one direction: counter-clockwise. What’s wrong is that not all other ( i.e. non-Nazi) swastikas turn the opposite direction (elbows pointing right). Rather than dutifully plod through a debun
Read more

The dreaded first test post!

Image
An irregularly updated blog about archaeology and related madness! ... might just be good! ** I'm always looking for guest writers! So if you have something that you want to say about archaeology, please get in touch! ** [** If you like any of the posts on this blog, please consider making a small donation. Each donation helps keep the Irish Radiocarbon & Dendrochronological Dates project going! **] &amp;amp;amp;lt;A HREF="http://ws.amazon.co.uk/widgets/q?rt=tf_sw&amp;amp;amp;amp;ServiceVersion=20070822&amp;amp;amp;amp;MarketPlace=GB&amp;amp;amp;amp;ID=V20070822%2FGB%2Frobmchaarc-21%2F8002%2Fb7e77064-bfea-4ba8-954d-a415ec05ad0c&amp;amp;amp;amp;Operation=NoScript"&amp;amp;amp;gt;Amazon.co.uk Widgets&amp;amp;amp;lt;/A&amp;amp;amp;gt;
Read more

Three Billboards Outside University College London: A case of approved plagiarism by Prof Andrew Bevan et al.

Image
Introduction The oft-recited adage is that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Going by this logic, there can be no higher praise from an academic than outright plagiarism of your work. I have had recent cause to be on the receiving end of just such praise and I can assure you, dear reader, that it doesn’t feel like a compliment at all. In fact, it sucks. I decided that, rather than meekly accept it, I was going to fight back for the recognition due to my work. To this end, I reached out to the two universities involved (University College London and Plymouth University) and the publishing journal (PNAS) and asked them to initiate investigations into the conduct of their employees/authors. I trusted that these institutions would be keen to ensure that their academics adhered to the highest standards and that any deviation would be met with swift correction. I was wrong and my trust was sorely misplaced. Until now I have only really discussed this issue with my cont
Read more