Co Kilkenny: Archaeological Objects at The British Museum

The British Museum holds five items identified as coming from Co Kilkenny, along with one item located to either Longford or Kilkenny. The majority of these (3) are assigned to the Early Medieval period, followed by the Early Bronze Age (2). The six items are all different object types. Only two material types are represented in this assemblage: Metal (5) and Glass (1).

< Table of Contents

Bronze Age: Metal item
Clonea
socketed axe
WG.1574
Copper alloy socketed axe; cast. Oval mouth with bevelled rim. Loop is set at base of the collar and its ends extend onto body. Cutting edge is moderately expanded but blunt.
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=807566&partId=1


Early Bronze Age: Metal items
Gowran
flat axe
WG.1529
Copper-alloy flat axe; with a thin, slightly rounded butt.
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=807206&partId=1

Castlecomer
halberd
WG.1597
Copper alloy halberd, asymmetrical blade with rounded hafting plate and straight, rounded midrib. Three rivet holes with two rivets in situ.
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=807612&partId=1


Early Medieval: Glass item
Kells
bracelet
18920421.150
Glass, fragment of bracelet with two lines of white dots between three lines of white spirals, all on blue ground.
5thC-11thC (?)
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=93097&partId=1


Early Medieval: Metal item
Kilkenny
plaque
19830701.100
Square open-work brass plaque depicting the Crucifixion: Christ flanked by Longinus, Stephaton and angels. Pierced with two rivets, for mounting to another object
11thC-12thC
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=94748&partId=1


The following item is listed in the museum catalogue as coming from either Longford or Kilkenny:
Early Medieval: Metal item
Longford/Kells, Co Kilkenny
mount
19231110.200
Gilt copper alloy cruciform mount; four animals around centre square setting; animal head flanked by interlace at top and bottom; mask on right.
8thC-9thC
http://britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=93193&partId=1



< Table of Contents
Location: Great Russell St, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DG, UK

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Always remember to draw the swastika turning to the right": Some thoughts on swastika directionality in Early Medieval Irish Art

Image
Swastikas are, for a number of reasons, endlessly fascinating symbols. Like all symbols, they are only invested with the meanings we give them. Otherwise they are just little shapes and drawings that mean nothing in and of themselves. Owing to its long history and brief (if traumatic) association with Nazism, the swastika probably has a stronger resonance than most. You won’t spend long on the internet attempting to discuss the swastika before someone, trying to be helpful, notes that the Nazi version rotated counter-clockwise (elbows pointing left) and was bad, but the good Buddhist/Hindu version rotated clockwise. They may be trying to be helpful, but they are invariably wrong. It’s true that the version Adolf Hitler designed for the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei only went one direction: counter-clockwise. What’s wrong is that not all other ( i.e. non-Nazi) swastikas turn the opposite direction (elbows pointing right). Rather than dutifully plod through a debun...
Read more

The dreaded first test post!

Image
An irregularly updated blog about archaeology and related madness! ... might just be good! ** I'm always looking for guest writers! So if you have something that you want to say about archaeology, please get in touch! ** [** If you like any of the posts on this blog, please consider making a small donation. Each donation helps keep the Irish Radiocarbon & Dendrochronological Dates project going! **] &amp;amp;amp;lt;A HREF="http://ws.amazon.co.uk/widgets/q?rt=tf_sw&amp;amp;amp;amp;ServiceVersion=20070822&amp;amp;amp;amp;MarketPlace=GB&amp;amp;amp;amp;ID=V20070822%2FGB%2Frobmchaarc-21%2F8002%2Fb7e77064-bfea-4ba8-954d-a415ec05ad0c&amp;amp;amp;amp;Operation=NoScript"&amp;amp;amp;gt;Amazon.co.uk Widgets&amp;amp;amp;lt;/A&amp;amp;amp;gt;
Read more

Three Billboards Outside University College London: A case of approved plagiarism by Prof Andrew Bevan et al.

Image
Introduction The oft-recited adage is that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Going by this logic, there can be no higher praise from an academic than outright plagiarism of your work. I have had recent cause to be on the receiving end of just such praise and I can assure you, dear reader, that it doesn’t feel like a compliment at all. In fact, it sucks. I decided that, rather than meekly accept it, I was going to fight back for the recognition due to my work. To this end, I reached out to the two universities involved (University College London and Plymouth University) and the publishing journal (PNAS) and asked them to initiate investigations into the conduct of their employees/authors. I trusted that these institutions would be keen to ensure that their academics adhered to the highest standards and that any deviation would be met with swift correction. I was wrong and my trust was sorely misplaced. Until now I have only really discussed this issue with my cont...
Read more