For the Attention of The Chief Archaeologist & Director of the National Museum of Ireland #TTM





In 2019 The Keeper of Irish Antiquities threatened to send both the Director of the National Museum of Ireland and the Chief Archaeologist after me, but neither had sufficient backbone to either approach me or reprimand their errant employee.

Now it's the back end of 2024 and there's still no end in sight. So I'm thinking it's time to resolve this.

For this reason, I'm calling on Michael MacDonagh, Chief Archaeologist at the National Monuments Service of Ireland, and Lynn Scarff, Director of the National Museum of Ireland, as well as the entire Board of the NMI (here) to show some forlorn modicum of actual leadership and reach out to me with a workable solution.

I would point out that such a solution must include a full apology and retraction of the curel, hurtful, and simply untrue remarks made by The Keeper of Irish Antiquities; answers to the questions repeatedly posed but unanswered by The Keeper of Irish Antiquities; as well as payment for my time in doing anything with the surviving archives (payment had better be in cash, because I have zero trust in y'all).

For all that, please understand that I'm not unreasonable. I'm not asking anyone to be publicly humiliated with a Walk of Atonement down Kildare St. I may even be persuaded to withdraw my expectation that the apology be accompanied by a fully-costumed interpretive dance of no less than three hours duration (excluding interval). I'll even go so far as to add that the additional scenes featuring a Greek Chorus of live cats meowing a collection of classic Show Tunes will be wholly at your discretion.




Also, before you do anything, take a few minutes to acquaint yourselves with the history of this dispute:






Considering how easily and quickly the NMI managed to find my original blog post, I'll not be following this up with separate emails - I'm sure one of your Crystal Bats will make you aware of this post!
 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Always remember to draw the swastika turning to the right": Some thoughts on swastika directionality in Early Medieval Irish Art

Image
Swastikas are, for a number of reasons, endlessly fascinating symbols. Like all symbols, they are only invested with the meanings we give them. Otherwise they are just little shapes and drawings that mean nothing in and of themselves. Owing to its long history and brief (if traumatic) association with Nazism, the swastika probably has a stronger resonance than most. You won’t spend long on the internet attempting to discuss the swastika before someone, trying to be helpful, notes that the Nazi version rotated counter-clockwise (elbows pointing left) and was bad, but the good Buddhist/Hindu version rotated clockwise. They may be trying to be helpful, but they are invariably wrong. It’s true that the version Adolf Hitler designed for the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei only went one direction: counter-clockwise. What’s wrong is that not all other ( i.e. non-Nazi) swastikas turn the opposite direction (elbows pointing right). Rather than dutifully plod through a debun
Read more

The dreaded first test post!

Image
An irregularly updated blog about archaeology and related madness! ... might just be good! ** I'm always looking for guest writers! So if you have something that you want to say about archaeology, please get in touch! ** [** If you like any of the posts on this blog, please consider making a small donation. Each donation helps keep the Irish Radiocarbon & Dendrochronological Dates project going! **] <A HREF="http://ws.amazon.co.uk/widgets/q?rt=tf_sw&ServiceVersion=20070822&MarketPlace=GB&ID=V20070822%2FGB%2Frobmchaarc-21%2F8002%2Fb7e77064-bfea-4ba8-954d-a415ec05ad0c&Operation=NoScript">Amazon.co.uk Widgets</A>
Read more

Three Billboards Outside University College London: A case of approved plagiarism by Prof Andrew Bevan et al.

Image
Introduction The oft-recited adage is that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Going by this logic, there can be no higher praise from an academic than outright plagiarism of your work. I have had recent cause to be on the receiving end of just such praise and I can assure you, dear reader, that it doesn’t feel like a compliment at all. In fact, it sucks. I decided that, rather than meekly accept it, I was going to fight back for the recognition due to my work. To this end, I reached out to the two universities involved (University College London and Plymouth University) and the publishing journal (PNAS) and asked them to initiate investigations into the conduct of their employees/authors. I trusted that these institutions would be keen to ensure that their academics adhered to the highest standards and that any deviation would be met with swift correction. I was wrong and my trust was sorely misplaced. Until now I have only really discussed this issue with my cont
Read more