New Adventures with High Crosses | Clogher, Co. Tyrone
[** If you like this post, please make a donation to the IR&DD project using the secure button at the end. If you think it is interesting or useful, please re-share via Facebook, Google+, Twitter etc. To help keep the site in operation, please use the amazon search portal at the end of the post - each purchase earns a small amount of advertising revenue**]
Earlier this summer I took time off work to help out with childcare and to spend some time with my two sons, while their regular child-minder took a much needed and deserved holiday. It turns out that my wife and I had … let’s call them ‘divergent’ … ideas as to what constitutes a ‘fun day out’ for the children. She does things like making aliens out of cardboard boxes and tissues, providing home-made playdough (called ‘squashy’ in our house), and building temporary housing for our garden snails (a snail aquarium, or ‘snailarium’, if you will). I, however, appear to have a different idea of ‘fun’. My tendency is to stick the kids in the car and head out in search of ice-cream, bacon, and archaeological sites … though not necessarily in that order. Results are variable, but we more often than not have a great time looking at interesting sites (and playing hide & seek), arriving home tired, bedraggled, and smelling suspiciously of pork products. This year my plan was to take them west – to beautiful, wonderful, Fermanagh – in search of island experiences.
Earlier this summer I took time off work to help out with childcare and to spend some time with my two sons, while their regular child-minder took a much needed and deserved holiday. It turns out that my wife and I had … let’s call them ‘divergent’ … ideas as to what constitutes a ‘fun day out’ for the children. She does things like making aliens out of cardboard boxes and tissues, providing home-made playdough (called ‘squashy’ in our house), and building temporary housing for our garden snails (a snail aquarium, or ‘snailarium’, if you will). I, however, appear to have a different idea of ‘fun’. My tendency is to stick the kids in the car and head out in search of ice-cream, bacon, and archaeological sites … though not necessarily in that order. Results are variable, but we more often than not have a great time looking at interesting sites (and playing hide & seek), arriving home tired, bedraggled, and smelling suspiciously of pork products. This year my plan was to take them west – to beautiful, wonderful, Fermanagh – in search of island experiences.
On one of these
excursions, we passed through Clogher. Today it seems like a relatively
ordinary Tyrone village, but it appears to have been a place of importance, on
the intersection of major route ways, from antiquity. Clogher Hillfort probably
dates to at least the Late Bronze Age and the complex includes a ring barrow, a
possible inauguration mound, along with the banks and ditches of the Hillfort ‘proper’.
Excavations by the wonderful Richard Warner in the 1970s, though sadly
unpublished, allowed the recovery of numerous high status artefacts including portions
of decorative metalwork and exotic pottery. By tradition, the nearby monastic
foundation was founded by St. Aedh Mac Cairthinn (c. 430–505 AD), an early disciple of St. Patrick. The site was
later recognised as an episcopal see, and it retains its status in the 18th
century Cathedral Church of Saint Macartan.
In all the years I worked
in field archaeology in Northern Ireland, I spent quite a lot of them ‘out west’,
in Tyrone, Fermanagh, Derry/Londonderry, and Cavan. I that time I passed
through Clogher on more times than I can count – maybe as many as a thousand times
… well, going each way every day for months at a go certainly racks up the
numbers! In that time, I believe, I only stopped in Clogher once – in the
company of the Historic Monuments Council when we stopped to visit Clogher
Hillfort. Most of the other times I was rushing to get to work or rushing to
come home – never a chance to stop and see the Early Christian High Crosses!
This occurred to me on our first summer excursion as I passed through with my
boys in the back of the car, moving with all legal velocity towards the
delights of Fermanagh. This time, as we passed, I noted that the church appeared
to have replaced its gates in the relatively recent past – they’re certainly
newer, shinier, and taller than I remembered them. I’ll write about where we
went in Fermanagh on some other occasion, but on the way home, I decide to stop
the car and see if we could get into see the crosses. I parked, and explained
with much enthusiasm to my young sons that (if we could get in) we were going
to see a couple of very old crosses. In fairness, they had been tramping about
Fermanagh since early morning and their patience was … ‘thin’. It was only when
I offered a bribe of (more) ice-cream they reluctantly agreed to follow me.
With refreshments purchased, we made our way up to the gates, only to find them
locked and barred. Even over the cacophony of the passing traffic, I perceived the
sound of knocking. After some blank-faced searching, I spotted an elderly lady
in one of the first-floor windows on the far side of the road. Once she was
sure she had acquired my attention, she made a series of hand-gestures that I
understood to mean ‘go around to the left, there is another entrance there’. I
now realise that this was the wrong interpretation of whatever she meant.
Instead, we ended up on the grounds of Saint Macartan’s Nursing Home,
explaining our situation to a member of the Sisters of Mercy. Unfortunately,
there was no entrance on that side and there never had been. The very lovely
and kind Sister looked at us three tired and bedraggled travellers, and offered
us refreshment. Not wanting to put her to any trouble I, of course, declined.
My beautiful sons had, it appears, not read the same manual of etiquette as I,
and protested loudly … even more so when they learned that biscuits would also
be forthcoming. That was how my sons and I spent a very pleasant late afternoon
in Clogher – sipping ice-cold MiWadi orange drink, crunching on biscuits, and passing
the time with a delightful nun who made a great fuss over my (suddenly) shy
boys. We didn’t get to see the crosses and, if truth be told, I didn’t particularly
mind either.
We may have missed
seeing the crosses, but I’d not forgotten them.
A week or two later the
whole family was heading west in search of another Fermanagh island experience.
As we passed through Clogher, I instinctively glanced to my left at the new
gates, giant and impenetrable. Only this time … they were … OPEN!! There was
only one thing to do! I dropped anchor and hurriedly pulled the car into the
side at the nearest available spot, spraying gravel and divots in my wake. As
no one else was interested in accompanying me up the tiny to non-existent
pavement, against the prevailing traffic, I grabbed my camera and went for it.
As I suddenly faced a very large and fast-moving Scania truck bearing down on
me as I rounded the corner, I rather though that I had made a particularly poor
decision in attempting to see these crosses and that I was about to meet my end
in Clogher. Thankfully, it was not to be and I successfully – just! – negotiated
the traffic and got into the churchyard.
The crosses are
probably of 9th or 10th century date and were found in
the grounds of the church and re-erected. Coincidentally, both crosses appear
to be missing a portion of their respective shafts and look somewhat squat and inelegant
as a result. At 2.75m, the more southerly cross is the taller of the two. Its
east face displays a rectangular panel of 18 bosses (set in three columns of six).
A similar arrangement probably was repeated further up the shaft, though only
eight appear to wholly or partially survive. The centre of the ringed cross
head is dominated by a single, large boss with indistinct traces of interlace
decoration within it. The two lower ring portions of the cross are decorated
with different patterns of interlace and scrollwork. The opposite (west) face
is a relatively similar arrangement with a rectangular panel of interlaced
circles and knot-work dominating the shaft. Originally an harmonious panel of
similar knot-work would have been placed above this, but the effect is spoiled
by the missing middle section. Again, the centre of the ringed cross head
contains a prominent boss, decorated with interlace, possibly in a triangular
or ‘triquerta’ knot pattern. However, owing to the low relief of the surviving
carvings, this is difficult to ascertain. All three surviving portions of the
outer ring appear to be decorated in an analogous manner to before, though this
too was difficult to see in the prevailing light conditions.
The north cross is,
today, slightly shorter at 2.30m. Its east face of the shaft is dominated by a
rough square of four interlaced spirals, and the cross head is decorated with a
smaller cross-like arrangement. It is difficult to make out, but it appears to
me to be an interlaced cross of sinuous vines, possibly with a four-petalled
flower at its centre. The opposite face has a low-relief roundel, or pseudo-boss
at the centre of the cross-head, and a diamond of false-relief knot-work in the
centre of the shaft. Although, owing to the light conditions, I couldn’t make
it out on the day, it appears from other photographs that some decoration
exists on the arms of the cross, possibly some low-relief interlace, but it is
difficult to be sure.
Lying between the two
crosses is what appears to be a portion of a shaft of a third cross. At the
base of the north cross there is a double bullaun stone. From older photographs
(e.g. Richardson & Scarry 1990,
Pl. 45) it seems that it once was leant against the base of the south cross,
where it was accompanied by the upper stone of a rotary disc quern. I may be
wrong, but I did not notice it on my visit, so it may have been moved indoors. Photographs
of the site from a 1982 visit by Billy Dunlop (now part of The William Dunlop
Archaeological Photographic Archive collection [Facebook | Website ]) appear to
show the same quern stone, if in somewhat more battered condition. Thus, despite
the date of the Richardson & Scarry publication, I’m inclined to believe
that the photographs used are considerably older. Where I have seen photographs
taken inside the cathedral (e.g. here
| here), I’ve not noticed it hanging about in the background, so it may not
have been placed there for safe keeping. Unless it’s still lurking about around
the church or grounds, I’m afraid that it may have been ‘lifted’ and that’s the
last we may see of it.
While I felt lucky to
get into the graveyard, my luck didn’t run so far as to get me past the church
door. Inside I would have found an Early Christian sun dial, probably dating to
the the period from 700 to 900 AD, and probably the oldest surviving item from
the site. Well, maybe it’s all for the best! This way, I still have a reason to
keep an eye out for open gates as I go through Clogher. I don’t know what I’ll
find – maybe just ice-cream, maybe the sun dial, maybe even the kindness of
strangers lavished on weary, parched travellers!
References
Harbison, P. 1992 Guide to the National and Historic Monuments
of Ireland. Gill & Macmillan, Dublin.
Richardson, H. &
Scarry, J. 1990 An Introduction to Irish
High Crosses. Mercier Press, Dublin.
Comments
Post a Comment